The more things change

A year ago, I wrote about the state of Washington — shutdown threats, delayed legislation and the critical need for the irrigation industry to have a voice at the table. Now, with a new administration in office and a new Congress in session, it’s fair to ask: Has anything really changed?

In a lot of ways, yes. A new White House brings new priorities, new agency leadership and shifts in regulatory and funding decisions. But in other ways, the fundamental challenges remain the same. Congress is once again navigating spending fights that could impact conservation programs, infrastructure investment and agricultural policy. The farm bill remains unfinished. Trade policies are in flux, creating uncertainty for manufacturers and producers alike.

The more things change, the more they stay the same.

A year of uncertainty, again

One of the biggest concerns for irrigation professionals and the broader agricultural industry remains federal funding. Last year, we were watching a divided Congress struggle to pass basic spending bills. This year, it’s a similar story: funding delays, shifting budget priorities and uncertainty over key USDA programs that provide critical support for water conservation and irrigation efficiency.

On top of that, we’re seeing renewed debates over trade policy. Tariffs are again in the conversation, with potential impacts on irrigation equipment costs and global commodity markets. And while new leadership at federal agencies means new approaches to water policy and environmental regulation, it doesn’t change the reality that policy decisions made in Washington have direct consequences for the irrigation industry.

When we talk to policymakers, we’re not just advocating for our industry; we’re reinforcing the role of smart irrigation in water conservation, economic stability and food security.

Why advocacy is more important than ever

Through all of this, the world doesn’t wait. The industry continues to innovate, adopting new water-saving technologies and improving efficiency, but those advancements require stable policy support and long-term investment. That’s why the Irrigation Association is doubling down on its advocacy efforts — not just in Congress but in the regulatory agencies and state legislatures where key decisions are being made.

When we talk to policymakers, we’re not just advocating for our industry; we’re reinforcing the role of smart irrigation in water conservation, economic stability and food security. We’re making sure lawmakers understand that funding for water efficiency isn’t just an environmental issue — it’s a business and economic issue.

What’s next?

Despite the challenges in Washington, there are opportunities ahead. We’re seeing growing recognition — on both sides of the aisle — of the need for sustainable water management solutions. There’s bipartisan support for investment in infrastructure and conservation programs. And as trade and tax policies evolve, there’s an opportunity to push for pro-growth policies that benefit the irrigation industry and the broader agricultural economy.

Last year, I emphasized the importance of showing up, engaging with policymakers and making our industry’s voice heard. That hasn’t changed. If anything, the uncertainty in Washington makes it even more critical.

As we look ahead to the coming months, the IA will continue to advocate for stable funding, economic policies that help our industry thrive, and smart policies that support irrigation businesses and the communities they serve. And we’ll keep pushing to ensure that when Congress and federal agencies make decisions about water policy, irrigation professionals are at the table.

Nathan Bowen is the vice president of advocacy and public affairs for the Irrigation Association.