Drip line tips

Get the most out of a drip irrigation system installation with these guidelines.
By Luz Staicer, CID

Drip irrigation systems are becoming more popular as an irrigation method in agriculture due to their reputation for water savings and overall efficiency, allowing growers to grow more economically and productively. By delivering water directly to plant roots, they can enhance resource efficiency and crop yields. However, the design process for these systems is a balancing act, involving a variety of technical considerations, mitigating potential issues and recognizing common myths.

Understanding the technical landscape

The most important part of establishing an optimal drip irrigation system is hydraulic design, which dictates water flow rates, pressure requirements and distribution uniformity. These factors are inherently tied to the limitations imposed by the water flow rate and pressure created from the source. Additionally, variables such as crop type and water needs, crop spacing, soil characteristics and terrain elevations all influence important decisions such as emission device selection, emitter spacing and pipe sizing.

Hydraulic calculations, including pressure loss assessments and flow changes along a lateral, are essential for ensuring optimal system performance and uniform water distribution across the field. Each component in a drip system contributes to these hydraulic calculations that determine the final design.

A major determining factor in hydraulics and system design is the emitter type. Emitter technologies serve as the backbone of drip irrigation systems, each presenting unique advantages and limitations. Pressure-compensating emitters maintain a relatively consistent flow rate irrespective of pressure fluctuations within a range, ensuring uniform water distribution along the entire length of the drip hose. This allows more flexibility in pipe sizing and pressure variances, potentially reducing the cost of overall material.

In contrast, nonpressure compensating emitters, while more economical, will experience changes in flow due to pressure variations and may result in uneven watering. The price of material will often increase to reduce the pressure variances and mitigate this issue and its impact on system performance. Other innovations such as anti-siphon mechanisms and compensating, nonleak emitters further enhance system reliability and longevity, addressing common site concerns and maintenance challenges.

Additionally, careful consideration of the water source and necessary filtration level is necessary for drip irrigation design. The quality and availability of the water source dictate factors such as the required pumping capacity and the extent of filtration needed. Effective filtration and water quality management are essential to prevent emitter clogging and system malfunctions. Various filtration systems, including screen, disc and media filters, can play a vital role in removing suspended solids and organic matter from the water source. It is imperative for each filtration system to align with the specific requirements of the chosen emitter and its associated orifice size, with designers ensuring sufficient pressure for backflushing and other maintenance procedures. Additionally, chemical treatments like chlorination or acidification are employed to mitigate microbial and bacterial growth within the system. Routine water analysis and testing are integral to ensuring that the water quality meets the necessary standards for optimal performance of the drip irrigation system.

Navigating common challenges

Despite the comprehensive calculations and planning involved, several common challenges can compromise the effectiveness of drip irrigation systems.

Emitter clogging remains a persistent challenge, with particulates, algae and bacterial growth often accumulating within emitters. Regular maintenance practices such as flushing, cleaning, and chemical maintenance and treatments are essential to mitigate clogging risks and prolong the system’s lifespan. Moreover, adherence to manufacturer specifications for filtration and periodic system inspections are indispensable to prevent and address maintenance issues promptly.

Inadequate system design poses another significant hurdle, encompassing factors such as improper emitter spacing, inadequate filtration or undersized and missing components. While it may be tempting to reduce pipe sizes to minimize upfront costs, insufficient pipe sizing can lead to excessive pressure loss, resulting in nonuniform water distribution, crop stress, increased energy costs and compromised system integrity.

Site-specific considerations, including topography, soil types and crop requirements, are an important part of the design process to maximize efficiency and productivity. Overlooking the necessity of air vents in the system poses yet another risk, potentially causing airlock issues that can impede water flow and cause damage to pipes and fittings. Proper integration of air vents allows for the release of trapped air, ensuring the system operates as designed.

Mismanagement of automation presents another possible pitfall, with incorrect sensor placement, calibration errors or reliance on outdated models sometimes leading to inaccurate irrigation scheduling and water wastage. While automation technologies offer significant potential for enhancing drip irrigation efficiency, human intervention remains necessary to interpret data accurately and address unforeseen challenges promptly. Some companies offer water management consulting services, where they will monitor the system, interpret data and alert a grower to any necessary schedule changes or inconsistencies that need to be reviewed and addressed. Striking the right balance between automation and manual oversight is crucial to optimizing system performance and resource efficiency.

Dispelling common myths

Despite their recognized efficiency, drip irrigation systems are not immune to misconceptions. One prevalent myth is that drip irrigation guarantees water savings. While drip irrigation systems are indeed celebrated for their water-saving potential, achieving meaningful savings requires careful system design, management and maintenance. Inefficient design, emitter clogging or suboptimal management practices can compromise water use efficiency and negate potential savings. Therefore, while drip irrigation technology facilitates water use efficiency, its effectiveness hinges on comprehensive implementation and ongoing maintenance practices.

Another common myth is that drip irrigation eliminates the need for monitoring. While advanced monitoring and automation capabilities offer invaluable insights, vigilant oversight and management are still indispensable. Monitoring soil moisture, system pressure and water quality are critical for detecting issues promptly and optimizing system performance. Human intervention remains key in interpreting data, adjusting settings and addressing unforeseen challenges to ensure the efficacy and longevity of drip irrigation systems.

Designing drip irrigation systems is a complex process, requiring a deep understanding of hydraulic principles and comprehensive planning. Using a qualified designer to provide the most cost-effective system that meets both crop and management needs will reap the maximum benefit provided by drip technology. By allowing an irrigation designer to navigate common challenges, implement innovative technologies and dispel misconceptions, farmers can harness the benefits of drip irrigation to optimize water use, enhance crop yields and promote sustainable agriculture for future generations.

Luz Staicer, CID, is the engineering manager at Avidwater LLC, Fresno, California.



Gains made, ground to cover

As representatives of the irrigation industry, we are not just advocates for our sector; we are stewards of a resource that sustains life.

Gradually and then suddenly

Here, I’ll share a couple of anecdotes that serve as bookends to some of my current thinking and research on aquifer depletion.

With a glass half full

These definitions highlight the challenges associated with maximizing profitability when irrigating with limited water supplies.